December 20, 2005
Intelligent Design Rejected
The federal court in the Kitzmiller et al. vs. Dover Area School District has come to a predictable decision (pdf): Intelligent Design is creationism in disguise, and as such cannot be taught in public schools. The link is to the entire decision, which is really long but worth reading. It debunks the idea that Intelligent Design is science, along with ID's criticisms of evolutionary theory.
Specific to the Dover case:
In summary, the disclaimer singles out the theory of evolution for special treatment, misrepresents its status in the scientific community, causes students to doubt its validity without scientific justification, presents students with a religious alternative masquerading as a scientific theory, directs them to consult a creationist text as though it were a science resource, and instructs students to forego scientific inquiry in the public school classroom and instead to seek out religious instruction elsewhere.
And:
Those who disagree with our holding will likely mark it as the product of an activist judge. If so, they will have erred as this is manifestly not an activist Court. Rather, this case came to us as the result of the activism of an ill-informed faction on a school board, aided by a national public interest law firm eager to find a constitutional test case on ID, who in combination drove the Board to adopt an imprudent and ultimately unconstitutional policy. The breathtaking inanity of the Board’s decision is evident when considered against the factual backdrop which has now been fully revealed through this trial. The students, parents, and teachers of the Dover Area School District deserved better than to be dragged into this legal maelstrom, with its resulting utter waste of monetary and personal resources.
The Discovery Institute, which is the nation's leading think-tank supporting ID, responds. I hope someone appeals this to the Supreme Court, so we can get a final word on this nonsense. (Of course, perhaps we don't want this going before a Bush-appointed Supreme Court.)
Of note: Judge John Jones III was appointed by Dubya. Damned activist judges.
Posted by mike, December 20, 2005 11:34 AMI love it when a judge is called "an activist" judge. I also love it when they say a judge is "legislating from the bench." Any view that disagrees with your point of view is "legislating from the bench?" Huh.
I also loved how they accused this particular judge of having "delusions of grandeur." Wh-wh-WHAT!? Isn't it the judge's job to make a decision? Then they went off to say "Americans don't like being told there is some idea they are not permitted to learn about." No one is stopping people from learning intelligent design! They are only stopping you from doing it in a freakin' science class, where it does not belong!
What is REALLY funny, though, is that if the judge had ruled the ID SHOULD be taught in classrooms, then the left could easily be saying, "He is legislating from the bench" and "He has delusions of grandeur!" I do not mean that as a knock on the left, but rather as a knock on the ambiguous arguments against the decision.
Besides that, I think the people have spoken about whether or not they want to learn ID. The Pennsylvania town whose school board implemented the ID in the classroom thing voted almost their entire school board out of office! It seems that most Americans don't want ID in science classrooms. Now, if you want to start a great topic in a college religion class...
Posted by: shane at December 24, 2005 12:25 AM