July 2, 2004
Marlon Brando, 1924-2004
A Streetcar Named Desire, On the Waterfront, The Wild One, The Godfather, The Last Tango in Paris, Apocalypse Now. There were few more memorable actors in film history. Where's his freaking parade?
Posted by mike, July 2, 2004 11:07 AMStelluhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh!
That was one hot man and one phenomenal actor.
Posted by: Amy at July 2, 2004 11:09 AMHe was too interesting to get a parade. I have to admit I was always annoyed at how he turned into a big whore for money, as Jon Stewart likes to say. Still, even with twenty some years of a complete lack of artistic viability, he's one of the greatest actors to ever live, and probably the greatest American actor. I was always waiting for his big comeback role. Too bad it never happened. There wasn't anybody like him before he showed up and there'll never be anyone like him again. We could really use someone with the "fuck you" attitude of the young Brando these days.
Posted by: Shawn at July 2, 2004 11:46 AMI don't think he ever went 20 years straight without any artistic viability, but I know what you mean. Ten years between Mutiny on the Bounty and The Godfather, ten years between Apocalypse Now and A Dry White Season, and then nothing really watchable since The Freshman.
Posted by: mike at July 2, 2004 12:46 PMHe was fat and old. That didn't help him out too much the past couple of decades.
Regardless, he was a great. I don't think he was the greatest, but he was indeed great.
Reminds me. Jan Herman owes me a dollar. We had a bet going on whether or not Bob Hope would die before Marlon Brando. I am sick. :-P
Posted by: shane at July 2, 2004 1:01 PMEven in the not so great movies, he had a lot of artistic viability, it just didn't come out all that great.
He was always pushing the envelope, experimenting, and just generally giving directors a run for their money.
He was an eccentric, and that is artistic.
Posted by: travis at July 2, 2004 1:58 PMHe admitted he only acted for the money. He asked Francis Ford Coppola to cut down his part in Apocalypse because he just didn't want to work too hard. Interesting and eccentric, yes. Artistic? I have my doubts. I think life wore him down and, after dealing with Hollywood for too long, he thought of acting as a bunch of bullshit. He may be right, but I wished he had pulled a Salinger and disappeared instead of making an ass of himself for some cash. I don't think he gave directors a run for their money out of any artistically experimental ideology. I think he was a dissapointed and faded star raging at the people he felt were beneath him. The way he treated the people he worked with in no way made him an artist. It made him an asshole. He sullied his own talent and that saddens me.
Posted by: Shawn at July 5, 2004 1:33 PMHe was such a fuck to Frank Oz during the filming of "The Score," which he was extraneous in anyway, that Robert De Niro had to direct the Brando scenes.
Posted by: mike at July 5, 2004 9:05 PMBut he was so freakin' awesome in Superman! :-P
Posted by: shane at July 6, 2004 9:16 AMSpeaking of "Superman," they actually showed it on TCM for the "Marlon Brando is Dead" marathon. Ugh. Oh well, at least they showed it at 1 am, and not at 8 pm like it was his best film or something. "On the Waterfront" got the primetime slot. Excellent.
Posted by: shane at July 12, 2004 9:20 AM