October 29, 2008

Oscar Profiles: Katharine Hepburn in Morning Glory

Best Actress winner 1933

"I know I speak so nondescriptly," Eva Lovelace says at one point, which caused me to chortle, because in this early-career, first-Oscar performance, Katharine Hepburn could have benefitted from a little more nondescriptness. She's a naive, fledgling actress from Vermont trying to make it big on Broadway by the most direct route, first camping out in producer Adolphe Menjou's office and later embarrassing herself at a dinner party with drunken takes on Hamlet and Juliet. Hepburn's trademark staccato delivery is too mechanical here, and where the part needed a bit of softness and warmth, her machine-gun technique comes across as brittle and clinically cold. The script doesn't help her out a whit, eliding her big understudy-makes-good stage triumph, perhaps out of a sense of economy (although the slim 74-minute running time could actually do with some padding), but more likely because this unformed Hepburn wouldn't be able to live up to the praise that the other characters shower on her. And her final, utterly confusing speech ("I'm not afraid! I'm not afraid!" afraid of what?)—well, nobody could have pulled that off convincingly, because it doesn't make any damn sense. Hepburn's not terrible here—she uses her scatterbrained mannerisms well in a speech about the exact circumstances of her future death, and at least she's fully committed to the painfully embarrassing party scene—but she didn't deserve the Oscar, which she won because the competition was so lax. There were fine, even timelessly great performances by women in 1933, including Barbara Stanwyck in The Bitter Tea of General Yen, Loretta Young in Man's Castle, and even Hepburn's genuine triumph in Little Women, but Oscar picked a particularly undistinguished trio, with May Robson in Lady for a Day and Diana Wynyard in the dreadful Cavalcade filling the rest of the dance card. Performance rating: 2.5 goats

Posted by mike, October 29, 2008 11:32 PM
Comments

Ooh yeah! Oscar profiles, Mike.

I haven't seen this particular Hepburn performance, since it seems to be so damn elusive at the moment. However, it seems to me that the nature of the role was always going to cause her problems. With her quirky, unique ways Hepburn always seems to play radical characters that try and distance themselves from uniform lives -- not that showbusiness is particularly uniform but perhaps moreso in this golden era -- and so maybe some of her soul is kind of lost in this??

It's why she's successful in Little Women, and the naive, tender age of Barbara Stanwyck in The Bitter Tea also helped with her performance I reckon. I found the character pretty standard, and her performance fair if not wonderful. More of a casting victory.

Posted by: Cal at November 2, 2008 3:20 PM

I wrote about this film/performance recently on my blog too. I didn't quite get it. I'm not sure why they didnt just nominate her for Little Women, a Best Picture nominee at that!

I too found the exclusion of the big performance sequence baffling. Tell us she's the greatest actress ever and then show us her taking a bow?! Ugh. And that script was terrible. The opening scene alone is nearly 30 minutes of the movie!

Posted by: Glenn at November 2, 2008 7:02 PM

Glenn, that opening scene WAS weird. I actually thought it was going to be the entire film, which might have been more interesting than what they ended up with. There were some good moments, I thought, like the aftermath of the party where we learn exactly how much of a bastard Adolphe Menjou is. But overall, it was pretty bad.

Posted by: mike at November 3, 2008 8:48 AM
Post a comment









Remember personal info?