June 25, 2008

The Feckin' Braadway Melody

Welcome to the second edition of Best Pictures from the Outside In, with a title provided by one of our participants, Nick of Nick's Flick Picks. The other two are Nathaniel of The Film Experience and yours truly, Mike at Goatdog's Movies. Each week we pull two Best Picture winners from Oscar's shelves, one from each end; last week we discussed the first and most recent winners, Wings and The Departed.

This time around, Oscar somehow knew that someday we'd spend part of the first week of this series harping on how guy-centric the Best Picture category tends to be, so he awarded the second Best Picture, for films released between August 2, 1928 and July 31, 1929, to the mother of all backstage musicals, The Broadway Melody, which follows the rise-to-the-top exploits of two dancing Midwestern sisters (Bessie Love and Anita Page) trying to make it big in the Big Apple. On the other end of the historical and thematic spectrum is 2006's The Departed, a hyper-masculine epic of crime and punishment that follows two double agents (Matt Damon and Leonardo DiCaprio) as they rise through the ranks of the cops and the crooks, respectively.

Mike: It's almost impossible, given the structure of this series, to avoid seeing parallels, and they're here: the scratch-and-claw rise to the top of the heap, the love triangles, the ghastly shootings—well, in one of them. But let me get this party started with two points of interest. First is the role of sound in The Broadway Melody, which, since it was released just over a year after Al Jolson said "you ain't heard nothing yet," is both a prisoner to its technical limitations and admirably adept at overcoming them, at least sometimes. Coming in the middle of the biggest technical overhaul in film history, it's a fascinating report card on how the film industry was coming along in its transition. Second, exactly how amazing is Vera Farmiga in The Departed? She takes a role that's basically a ruler against which the two alpha males can measure their dicks [is that too harsh? i don't think so] and makes Madolyn not only a three-dimensional person, but one of the most interesting characters in the film.

Nathaniel: It's an impossible role to be sure. So, Farmiga deserves props from making something of it. What she makes of it... well, your mileage may vary. But on this second viewing I was reminded that most everyone in The Departed is at the top of their game. Damon and DiCaprio are both even better on repeat viewings. They're so tightly strung one half expects them to snap in virtually every scene. DiCaprio's worry line cut so deep I wanted to suture it. Ouch. Scorsese knows how to sell urgency and I love imagining that behind the scenes the actors were all fully aware of how easily they could get lost in the big ensemble. They're following Frank Costello's opening credo: "No one gives it to you. You have to take it."

As for the mechanics of movie-making—narrowing it to sound is smart—The Departed sounds terrific, capitalizing on years of the technical virtuousity. We're all accustomed to the way movies overlap sound from one scene to the next (the visual equivalent being the dissolve) but with The Departed... is it just my imagination or does Scorsese let the sound bleed for much longer than other films do. The result is that everything feels simultaneous and dangerously fast. I found that a huge relief after the clumsiness of Broadway Melody. The latter plays so awkwardly for modern ears, its sound jarringly cutting in and out with each edit. It's undermic'ed. It's overmic'ed. It's a mess, an unpleasant experience. Though I did get a good chuckle from the opening prologue which feels crazy with elation about throwing all the sound at you at once. "Listen to what we can do: Crowd sounds. Office noise. Dialogue. Music! Hear it! Isn't it wonderful?"

Nick: I'm absolutely on the Vera Farmiga train, which is just a keyhole into my favorite aspect of The Departed: you think it's going to be a high-concept picture, about two protagonists in this chiastic, unknowing pursuit of each other, and instead it's a sprawling, calico suspense-thriller character-drama, where this huge host of sterling actors is given full license to bleed all kinds of life and idiosyncrasy into the story, all of them creating real people who don't seem aware at all of "supporting" Damon and DiCaprio, who in turn don't seem aware of giving star turns in a big prestige picture. Nicholson remains a problem for me, shouty and arrogantly effusive, but Alec Baldwin, Vera Farmiga, Anthony Anderson, Mark Wahlberg, Martin Sheen, and so many others make this an enormously gratifying psychological experience. Plus a great thrill-ride, mostly for those sound and editing rhythms that Nathaniel describes. Love those occasional freeze-frames. And even if a couple of the set-pieces don't pan out (DiCaprio stalking Damon out of the movie theater always feels a bit clunky to me), the rooftop catastrophe, the turn-your-cellphones-off espionage job in the warehouse, the second rooftop catastrophe... those are sensational sequences.

By contrast, The Broadway Melody seems pretty beholden to its central love-triangle plot and its self-conscious technical breakthrough. Almost everything is keyed in those two directions, which only underlines the fact that the movie is too long. I'm guessing I was a little less impressed than you, Mike (albeit less sensitive to the evolving, year-by-year standards for sound incorporation), and more impressed than you, Nathaniel. I'm pretty shocked that none of the filmmakers seemed bothered by the fact that the Mahoney Sisters are just a terrible act, but as the film goes on—and again, it does go on—I got much more interested this time in Hank's increasing panic and unhappiness, and even a little bit in Queenie's sexual-romantic dilemma, despite the frequent ghastliness of Anita Page's gangly and tentative performance. Did these hooks work for either of you?

Nathaniel: Oddly, absolutely nothing worked for me in Broadway Melody save for those moments when it suddenly forgot to be a sound picture. There's a few blissful cutaway shots where the sound drops out and you get just a close-up of a face or a reaction shot, usually of Hank (the elder more business savvy sister) looking concerned for Queenie (the younger). It was a silent movie for a few seconds. It's the only time I felt anything for the characters.

Another connection between the films: There's a complete shortage of sympathetic characters, a surprise given that we always think of Best Pictures as erring on the side of playing for the heartstrings. My mind quickly jumps to Million Dollar Baby (a subject for a few weeks from now) when there's barely a character flaw in sight. The leads in Broadway Melody are talent-free, deceitful and contemptuous of anyone else in the theater. They lie to each other repeatedly. But it's not a Chicago style black comedy. We're supposedly to genuinely care for them but they do nothing to earn it. The Departed? Even the lovely Farmiga is ethically challenged. "Cops or criminals: What's the difference?" as the movie itself asks.

Mike: Let me clarify: I don't really like The Broadway Melody—it's got to be in the bottom five winners—and whatever praise I have for it is indeed for how well it escapes the strictures of late-20s sound. Yes, it trumpets, probably too much, the mere fact that it has "Crowd sounds. Office noise. Dialogue. Music!" (which Nathaniel described so well). And to modern ears, the sound problems you described are off-putting. But from a film history standpoint, it's pretty amazing how far it is from the stereotypical Singin' in the Rain-style "let's all stand around the flower pot" techniques. It has sound coming from multiple sources, and the filmmakers achieved this even if they had to bring in a phonograph or an orchestra to play offscreen. As for the bad acts that are the Maloney Sisters ("Mahoney!"), the second time around didn't make me care much more about Hank, and even less about Queenie, although it did pique my interest in the boundaries of their relationship—I think Hank has a hankering for her sister that goes beyond simple sisterly protectiveness.

And as for The Departed, I'm not afraid to admit it. I had to look up "chiastic." And then I had to look up "chiasmus." And I really, honestly hate Jack Nicholson in this film, beyond my usual disdain for the accolades he tends to receive for doing that "Crazy Jack" thing again and again. But he's the only bad apple in this bunch. Well, unless you count the point that Nathaniel brought up about this being the most morally deficient bunch of liars and cheats and self-deluders possibly in the history of this category. Really, it's still quite surprising that this film won, given its genre, its general lack of sympathetic characters, and its violence. This might be a silly question, but why do you think Oscar picked this particular Scorsese film to honor?

Nick: Well, I personally think The Departed won because the other four nominees were impossible as winners—even though I realize that if one of them had won, I'd say it was because the other four, including The Departed, were impossible as winners. But given that we all knew people who thought Babel was overstrained and Little Miss Sunshine and The Queen were awfully modest and Letters from Iwo Jima was quite aloof (and fans as well as detractors of these movies seemed to agree frequently on these counts), how do you NOT vote for the propulsive energy of this film, dignified by a big and tony cast, and directed by a badly owed auteur. Plus, even though few people think The Departed is among Scorsese's best, I'm sure I heard a sigh of relief that there was more left in him than Gangs of New York and The Aviator. Honoring him for those would, to me, would have been like belatedly anointing Hitchcock for Torn Curtain or Topaz.

In the category of Never Thought I'd See the Day, I feel an urge to say something else in favor of The Broadway Melody, even beyond the sheer, outrageous, derisive pleasure of watching Bessie Love kick in a circle like an autistic stork and play her ukulele as a badge of her "art." I actually respect the movie—there's a huge Spoiler warning over this whole feature, right?—for stranding Hank so glumly with the arch, indifferent, deliciously bitchy Flo at the end of the film. Queenie, the avowed idiot, gets a lover no one would want, and Hank, to make it in show business, has to give up the man she loves and cast her lot with a bitter floozy. In contrast to all the rootin' tootin' for the Broadway life that we hear through the whole movie, the finale seems pretty brave. And in line with Nathaniel's point about the strangely off-putting character arcs throughout. (For the real deal, i.e., a really good movie, hang in there for Broadway Melody of 1940, with my favorite Fred Astaire acting performance, and a series of wowza dances with Fred and the incredible Eleanor Powell.)

By the way, speaking of other people's points, how did the straight guy in our trio beat us to the actressexual punch on Vera Farmiga, Nathaniel, and THEN drop the first hint about Hank and Queenie's lavender closet? We're such loafers, even if we are also light in them.

Mike: I'm straight but not narrow. Also, I hang around in real life and on the internet with actressexuals; it was bound to rub off eventually.

Nathaniel: I have to confess: the lavender streak never once crossed my mind—I was probably too flustered by that old school dyke (excuse me "big woman") and fag (flamey costume designer) bitchfight in the chorus girls dressing room. There's even a literal "lavender" punch-line in the scene. But reading Goatdog's errant line about sisterlove felt like a thunderbolt. Hank (love the name) is way too invested in her sibling. It's practically the Hotel New Hampshire Melody once Hank starts fretting about Queenie wandering from their (shared) bed.

Not that I want to turn this series into Uncovering Oscar's Gay Agenda but it has been a little weird how plentiful the homo subtext has been in three of these first four movies (with the exception of No Country for Old Men). I don't want to underline this too much, but consider The Departed's fascination with Colin's (Matt Damon) troubled sexuality: the constant references to homosexuality, the impotence... It's pretty meaty stuff if you're looking to dig deeper. All of the best Hollywood movies have those hidden layers if you want to dig for or argue about them, with the frosting of pure entertainment on top if you don't.

I'd love to share Nick's feelings about the wrap-up of Broadway Melody but I don't think those "settling for" beats are intentional. Surely, the movie hasn't been that smart or self-aware previously? Too me The Broadway Melody is all frosting. It's gone awfully stale since 1929.

What do you, the reader, think about Oscar's Secret Gay Agenda? Or other things...

Stats: Depending on who you ask, The Broadway Melody was nominated for three Oscars and won only Best Picture. The two "nominations" for Best Actress (Bessie Love) and Best Director (Harry Beaumont) were unofficial.
The Departed was nominated for five and won four (Picture, Director, Editing, and Adapted Screenplay).

Posted by mike, June 25, 2008 11:30 AM
Comments

I am curious to read more about what people think of Farmiga's performance. I thought she was riveting but does it add up? I mean does Madolyn make ANY sense? or is she just really good at making like she does to cover up the script problems with that particular character?

also thank you again for including the AUTISTIC STORKā„¢ dance number for all to see. you rock.

Posted by: Nathaniel R at June 25, 2008 2:35 PM

Great discussion, once again, on two films I've only seen once apiece. For Broadway Melody it's been a while, and though I'm not going to argue for it as a great movie (or even a very good one) in my memory banks I still prefer its awkward, earnest charm to the somewhat-less-awkward, far-more-earnest grating of some of the 1930s winners (all the more galling because they bested some wonderful films seemingly because they wore their ambitiousness on their sleeves).

I like the Departed. It's not a perfect film either, but I thought at the time that it one of Scorsese's better films, and superior to some of his anointed favorites (cough***Raging Bull***). I have not dipped back into the rat pit for a second viewing yet, though. Right this minute, I think I'd rather peek at Broadway Melody again (and the silent version intrigues me for some reason). But that's my obsession with Hollywood history talking.

Anyway, the Departed was certainly the best of its field, from my point of view. Re: Little Miss Sunshine and the Queen, is "awfully modest" a euphemism for "modestly awful"?

Posted by: Brian at June 25, 2008 7:35 PM

funny re: the euphemism.

after seeing The Departed a second time I think I undervalued it the first. But then I don't always agree on Scorsese consensusi --plural? ;) for me his best are obviously taxi driver and king of comedy rather than raging bull and whatever ... but not everyone agrees.

i'm a little nervous about what you're saying about the 30s winners. One of the reasons i wanted to do this project is that for all the oscar writing i do i haven't seen several of the early winners... we'll see how it goes.

Posted by: Nathaniel R at June 25, 2008 10:12 PM

We certainly have some rough going in the next several weeks. It's been a while, but I remember Cimmaron, Cavalcade, The Great Ziegfeld, and The Life of Emile Zola inhabiting various states of unwatchability. Shudder. I can't believe I've committed to watch The Life of Emile Zola again. Maybe I'm not feeling well that week...

Posted by: mike at June 25, 2008 10:21 PM

The Broadway Melody is a disaster, no doubt about that. It's stodgy, painfully tedious and contains some of the most horribly awkward/corny acting ever (I'm surprised no one's mentioned that guy who stuttered every line he said....that was annoying). That said, it's scary to think that it was probably Oscar's best choice that year: I have yet to see In Old Arizona and The Patriot is lost, but The Hollywood Revue can't even be called a movie since it's just the MGM stable of stars doing random vaudeville acts and Alibi has one good scene (when Chester Morris meets his girlfriend's cop father and suitor) and the other 80 minutes is pure cheese (especially compared with The Public Enemy and Little Caesar 2 years later). The only thing Melody has going for it is Bessie Love, possibly the first great sound performance, and the Freed/Brown score.

I, for one, love The Departed and would rather watch it than Raging Bull (I don't know how I've survived that twice...great film, but grueling). Great acting all around- yes, even Jack Nicholson- and explosive direction from Scorsese. Every scene pops with energy and actually made me cheer on every murder and gunfight. I thought Vera Farmiga was fabulous in The Departed. She took a nothing character and made me interested in her which, I believe takes real talent.

I've got to say that I'm loving this series so far. I love hearing all of your opinions about the early winners especially. And if you think Melody is bad, wait until the 30's (Cimarron and Cavalcade) and then again in the 50's (Around the World in 80 Days and The Greatest Show on Earth). Those films are great, he said with heavy sarcasm.

Posted by: Dame James Henry at June 26, 2008 12:35 AM

Absolutely loving these conversations, even though in this instance I've never seen Broadway Melody and like The Departed (Vera and Leo and Alec etc aside) a good deal less than The Aviator. Still, if a straight movie's queerness is to be judged on how too, too much it's protesting, The Departed may be the gayest macho adventure since Top Gun, right? I'm curious to know: weren't you guys perturbed at all by the relentless, fag-fag-superfag banter and all the actors lapping it right up? I found it went way beyond realistic bloke-talk and entered the realm of the gratuitous, I have to say, not that it's my main reason for feeling a bit out of step on this movie.

Anyway, if only these films themselves offered the sparkling repartee you fellas have got going on. Your loafers line is priceless, Nick.

Posted by: Tim R at June 26, 2008 6:36 AM

I can't speak for anyone else but I think I tuned it out to a small degree because I think Scorsese always goes for overkill with foul-mouthed banter. I mean there's so much here to be offended by that I didn't want to get too hung up on one particular offense.

i'm not suggesting that 'fag' banter alone suggests queerness in the 'lady who protests too much' ... just that there are other elements of Damon's performance and the script that support that possible interpretation. Damon is such a talented actor, isn't he? So much more subtle than some of his peers.

Posted by: Nathaniel R at June 26, 2008 8:23 AM

Well, first off, it deserves to be said that Tim's take on The Departed was my favorite dissenting opinion that I read during the time of the film's release. And I know we still disagree about some of the formal stuff, too, like the edits, which I know didn't impress you, Tim, but I still relish them every time I see the movie.

On the "fag" stuff: over the course of the film it kind of veers for me among the three poles of a) credibly evocative of a milieu, b) in keeping with the amped-up exaggeration and violence of the whole film, and c) annoying and overmuch. I don't have the same sense of the actors relishing the pejoratives, but I do think Scorsese sometimes has trouble distinguishing that which is expressively Too Much and that which is coarsely or indulgently Too Much (viz., for me, almost everything about Casino, which as I recall, you like very much). Part of what keeps The Departed just shy of the A– for me is that I think it has a few too many bloodlusty bludgeony bust-up scenes, and that's where I get a little queasy. For some reason the verbal rhetoric doesn't gall as much as the arm-breaking and bloodletting. (That's not meant facetiously: in many films, I feel the reverse.)

Posted by: Nick Davis at June 26, 2008 11:12 AM

Is it possible that having most of the homophobic comments directed at Damon or made by him was a sort of adolescent equating of being gay with being false and untrustworthy? Like he's false to the people around him, which is because he doesn't realize he's gay? Seems like, given Hollywood's historical tendency to portray gay people as generally deviant, it's not too much of a stretch to see this "is he or isn't he" directed at the double-agent for the bad guys (of course Leo has Right on his side, so he's 100% straight and has no problems getting it up) as a reflection of that history. Or am I reading too much into it?

Posted by: mike at June 26, 2008 12:24 PM

Charming responses, guys, and I think Mike is bang on with that last point: all the insinuation around Damon's character, from what I remember, is that he swings both ways, in every sense. I just re-read my own dissent there and agree with, well, half of it, but I did give the movie a second viewing around Oscar-time and had a slightly less grumpy experience -- Damon, in particular, grew on me, and I don't recall having any particular objections to the editing second time round -- it is rhythmically quite exciting. A bit like Nick on No Country For Old Men, I must have felt the need to call the movie out as a lot less, somehow, than people were making it out to be, because there was some crazy talk going on in a lot of the early reviews. I take Nick's point about Casino, which is even more savagely violent at points, but coheres for me far more satisfyingly as an overall watch, partly because I think it's about something, and a different something from the even better Goodfellas: not loyalty, but the taint of money. I think The Departed strains to be about anything except its entertaining ensemble dynamics: that damp squib of a rat joke at the end is almost an admission, I'd say, that the movie has failed to get us anywhere far, since it could have started with the same shot. Not an actively bad Best Picture, but a disposable one, landing in the middle of a mediocre field with one clear standout -- I think Scorsese and Eastwood should have swapped their 2004 and 2006 gongs, essentially...

Looking forward to next week!

Posted by: Tim R at June 26, 2008 6:56 PM

Gotta hand it to you guys. You actually came up with an enjoyable comparison of two films that have no reason to ever be mentioned together. Keep up the good work!

Posted by: BGK at July 3, 2008 1:03 PM
Post a comment









Remember personal info?